The Corner

With Trump’s Sentencing Moved, Harris Loses a Much-Needed Inflection Point

Left: Former president Donald Trump looks on in New York City, September 6, 2024. Right: Vice President Kamala Harris speaks in Detroit, Mich., September 2, 2024. (David Dee Delgado, Brendan McDermid/Reuters)

Now, it’s all about the debate.

Sign in here to read more.

A brief note in reaction to the important — but long predicted, by Andy McCarthy among others — news out of Manhattan: Judge Juan Merchan has moved the sentencing of Donald Trump in his state-level conviction, previously scheduled for September 18, to November 26, after the election (“if necessary” — Trump’s legal team has filed a motion to set aside the verdict altogether that the court must first rule on the week before this hearing). Trump’s fans can take solace, and even people who loathe the man should take the philosophical view and thank God that we avoided having a ten-ton political depth charge explode directly underneath America’s political hull again this election cycle. (To the Democrats, I can say only this: If you thought sentencing Trump to prison on charges most people believe to be entirely political would help you, you are wrong, and you misunderstand the suburbanite voters you thought it would shake off the fence. You did not want that to happen with a month and a half to go until Election Day, believe me.)

The upshot of this for the election, of course, is that Kamala Harris’s campaign strategy — designed explicitly to keep her away from journalists, unguarded mics, and unmediated cameras — has lost one of its most fervently prayed-for wild-card events of the final stretch of the campaign. Trump’s sentencing, in the Harris people’s conception, was going to be an ideal capper for their electoral argument: They could just run “convicted felon sentenced to [X] years in prison” ads on TV all over Bucks County, Pa., and Oakland County, Mich., and assume they’d flip enough educated whites. (As I said above, I have real doubts about that.) They also might have been able to console themselves with the idea that, even after a poor or middling debate showing, this would be the last major public inflection point in the final stretch of the race, the impression voters went to their mail-in ballots thinking about.

Now all that is off the table. Unless Harris goes out there and begins to take interviews in a panic, or agrees to further debates (on the same principle), then next Tuesday, at the September 10 debate, is the last time you will ever see her outside of a rally or friendly audience. Should she stumble or fall — or merely fail to impress, which is much more likely — she will find herself stuck in neutral with no way to move the media cycle in her direction before November. (She will instead have to rely on mainstream media to help her out, and we can assume they heartily will.) The stubbornness of key swing states in the polls is beginning to sink in for everyone now, even in the media. (The campaigns noticed it internally long ago, as I pointed out in an earlier piece.) The race is falling into a stasis that narrowly favors Trump, and since Judge Merchan’s sentencing can no longer be expected to upend the race, everything now rides on what happens next Tuesday. Debates matter, my friends.

Jeffrey Blehar is a National Review staff writer living in Chicago. He is also the co-host of National Review’s Political Beats podcast, which explores the great music of the modern era with guests from the political world happy to find something non-political to talk about.
You have 1 article remaining.
You have 2 articles remaining.
You have 3 articles remaining.
You have 4 articles remaining.
You have 5 articles remaining.
Exit mobile version