. . . says New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof. He tweets:
The paper for which Kristof writes ran nearly 50 front-page stories about Abu Ghraib in the month after the story broke (not quite the same level of zeal, however, about Benghazi). Back then, few if any mainstream-media folks expressed much concern about Democratic “intransigence” over anyone even remotely connected to Abu Ghraib, despite vigorous attempts to link the scandal to the highest levels of the Defense Department. And the New York Times refused to “move on.”