The Corner

Taiwan’s Referendum & U.S. China Policy

A reader: “Shouldn’t NRO be taking a strong position on the Taiwan

referendum instead of ignoring it? How is the Bush Administration position

on Taiwan’s referendum compatible with ’The National Security Strategy of

the United States of America’?

Isn’t it incredibly cynical for the Bush Administration to stand for

Democracy at the point of the sword in Iraq while not recognizing the right

to self determination of the people of Taiwan?”

The people of Taiwan HAVE self-determination. No substantive matter of

Taiwan’s internal policy is dictated by China, nor by anyone else. In this

globalized world, I don’t know that they have any less self-determination

than anyone else–than the average member of the EU, for example.

The aim of U.S. policy should be to help the people of Taiwan preserve the

self-determination they have got, and not lose it by tweaking the dragon’s

tail. Governments have to weigh goods against other goods. For Taiwan to

have a referendum on its nationhood would be good–I won’t argue with that.

For China to give us serious help in restraining the Norks, and to stop the

flagrant selling of missile technology to US-hostile regimes–those are

other goods–and, so far as the people of the U.S. are concerned, far

greater ones. If indeed (I have my doubts, and will write about them in due

course) the administration has got some real help on those issues in return

for some rough words to the Taiwan govt., personally I could live with it.

John Derbyshire — Mr. Derbyshire is a former contributing editor of National Review.
Exit mobile version