The Corner

Spelling Reform Cont’d

I’ve received enormous amounts of email from readers about spelling reform. One reader sent me this essay from 1946:  Meihem In Ce Klasrum By Dolton Edwards.

Another reader sent me this essay he gives out  to his community college students:

The European  Union commissioners  have announced  that agreement  has been reached to adopt English  as the preferred language for  European communications, rather than German,  which was the other  possibility.  As  part  of  the  negotiations,  the British government conceded that English spelling  had some  room for  improvement and  has accepted  a five-year phased plan for what will be known as EuroEnglish (Euro  for short).

In  the  first  year,  “s”  will  be  used  instead  of  the soft “c”.

Sertainly, sivil servants will reseive this news with joy.  Also,  the

hard  “c”  will  be  replaced  with  “k”.  Not only will this klear up

konfusion, but typewriters kan have one less letter.

There will be growing publik  enthusiasm in the sekond year,  when the troublesome “ph” will  be replaced by  “f”. This will  make words like “fotograf” 20 per sent shorter.

In  the  third  year,  publik  akseptanse  of  the new spelling kan be

expekted  to  reach  the  stage  where  more  komplikated  changes are possible. Governments  will enkorage  the removal  of double  letters, which have  always ben  a deterent  to akurate  speling. Also,  al wil agre  that  the  horible  mes  of  silent  “e”s  in  the  languag   is

disgrasful, and they would go.

By the fourth year, peopl wil  be reseptiv to steps such as  replasing

“th” by z” and “w” by ” v”.

During  ze  fifz  year,  ze  unesesary  “o”  kan  be  dropd from vords

kontaining “ou”,   and similar changes  vud of kors  be aplid to  ozer

kombinations of leters.

After zis fifz yer, ve vil hav  a reli sensibl riten styl. Zer vil  be

no mor trubls or difikultis and evrivun vil find it ezi tu  understand

ech ozer.

Ze drem vil finali kum tru.

 

The more I think about it, My initial enthusiasm is cooling. In my gut I think I want to do a 180 (“Well, there’s enough maneuvering room in there to do that!” — The Couch.). Yes, our words are spelled weird. Sure there are inefficiencies. But was there ever a champion of, say, Esperanto, that was one of the good guys? Please: No references to the movie Incubus.  

I’m thinking we should take it a bit slower.  Maybe we need a committee?

Exit mobile version