I actually have seen a lot less RINO calling … more see it as a prudential dispute about strategy. Or maybe that is wishful thinking on my part?
Speaking of Charles Krauthammer and Laura Ingraham, they both raised the possibility of no votes switching to abstentions. But so far I have only heard that tactic discussed among people who are not in the House of Representatives.
Normal.dotm
0
0
1
1
10
National Review
1
1
12
12.0
0
false
18 pt
18 pt
0
0
false
false
false
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-parent:””;
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:”Times New Roman”;
mso-fareast-font-family:”Times New Roman”;
mso-bidi-font-family:”Times New Roman”;}
Speaking of strategy: With all the talk about a Balanced Budget Amendment option, I do hope there is some strategy there. One that might be remotely plausibly doable?
We will see before too long …