The Corner

National Security & Defense

Biden’s Strongly Worded Statements Won’t Restore Red Sea Deterrence

President Joe Biden speaks on the day of the Armed Forces Farewell Tribute at Summerall Field at Joint Base Myer-Henderson Hall, Arlington, Va., September 29, 2023. (Evelyn Hockstein/Reuters)

You know the Biden administration is serious when it issues not just a strongly worded statement but rather a strongly worded joint statement.

Recognizing the broad consensus as expressed by 44 countries around the world on December 19, 2023, as well as the statement by the UN Security Council on December 1, 2023, condemning Houthi attacks against commercial vessels transiting the Red Sea, and in light of ongoing attacks, including a significant escalation over the past week targeting commercial vessels, with missiles, small boats, and attempted hijackings,

We hereby reiterate the following and warn the Houthis against further attacks:

We haven’t even gotten to the substance yet, and it has already implicitly admitted failure. If you’re reiterating, that means you’ve said all of this already, and the Houthis didn’t care. As it says, a bunch of countries have already gotten together and written words on paper about Red Sea shipping — so, naturally, the thing to do now is write the words on paper again.

Ongoing Houthi attacks in the Red Sea are illegal, unacceptable, and profoundly destabilizing. There is no lawful justification for intentionally targeting civilian shipping and naval vessels. Attacks on vessels, including commercial vessels, using unmanned aerial vehicles, small boats, and missiles, including the first use of anti-ship ballistic missiles against such vessels, are a direct threat to the freedom of navigation that serves as the bedrock of global trade in one of the world’s most critical waterways.

These attacks threaten innocent lives from all over the world and constitute a significant international problem that demands collective action. Nearly 15 percent of global seaborne trade passes through the Red Sea, including 8 percent of global grain trade, 12 percent of seaborne-traded oil and 8 percent of the world’s liquefied natural gas trade. International shipping companies continue to reroute their vessels around the Cape of Good Hope, adding significant cost and weeks of delay to the delivery of goods, and ultimately jeopardizing the movement of critical food, fuel, and humanitarian assistance throughout the world.

From a Houthi viewpoint, all of the effects listed are reasons why they are committing the attacks in the first place. If you’re an Islamic terrorist group, there are few things you want more than to disrupt global commerce, break international law, threaten civilians, and attack Americans. Attacking container ships in the Red Sea allows Houthis to do all four at the same time. From their perspective, it’s a no-brainer.

They were deterred in the past by U.S. and allied military might. They no longer feel deterred. They won’t feel deterred again by more strongly worded statements.

Let our message now be clear: we call for the immediate end of these illegal attacks and release of unlawfully detained vessels and crews. The Houthis will bear the responsibility of the consequences should they continue to threaten lives, the global economy, and free flow of commerce in the region’s critical waterways. We remain committed to the international rules-based order and are determined to hold malign actors accountable for unlawful seizures and attacks.

Instead of repeating the call for an immediate end to the attacks, the United States should end the attacks, immediately — with ordnance.

Dominic Pino is the Thomas L. Rhodes Fellow at National Review Institute.
Exit mobile version