One last quick thought on Peter’s TRB. In the piece, he takes one of Mark Levin’s signed NRO pieces to represent NR’s corporate opinion. We love Mark, but this is not the case. People make this understandable mistake all the time (thinking by-lined NRO pieces must necessarily be NR’s position), but what’s notable about this instance is that Peter cites positively pieces by Robert George and David Frum, without even noting that they also were signed pieces appearing on NRO, just like Levin’s, let alone taking them to represent our editorial line. Kind of curious…