More Evidence for the Mismatch Argument
A new NBER paper looks at California data and finds evidence for the “mismatch” argument, specifically that preferentially admitted students are less apt to complete a program in a STEM field than similar students who attend schools where they are more academically competitive:
University Differences in the Graduation of Minorities in STEM Fields: Evidence from California Peter Arcidiacono, Esteban M. Aucejo, V. Joseph Hotz
NBER Working Paper No. 18799 Issued in February 2013 NBER Program(s): ED
The low number of college graduates with science degrees — particularly among under-represented minorities — is of growing concern. We examine differences across universities in graduating students in different fields. Using student-level data on the University of California system during a period in which racial preferences were in place, we show significant sorting into majors based on academic preparation, with science majors at each campus having on average stronger credentials than their non-science counterparts. Students with relatively weaker academic preparation are significantly more likely to leave the sciences and take longer to graduate at each campus. We show the vast majority of minority students would be more likely to graduate with a science degree and graduate in less time had they attended a lower ranked university. Similar results do not apply for non-minority students.
Professor Arcidiacono riled up the administration at Duke for his study of preferences there, which found the same thing. Good to see that he hasn’t been mau-mau’ed into silence.